I’m starting to think the new Gap logo was done horribly on purpose, in an effort to create a social media firestorm. The evidence…

There was no press release issued from the Gap regarding the branding change.
The new logo is just barely believable.
The favicon logo on Gap’s website wasn’t changed (geek detail).
 The new logo wasn’t added to any of Gap’s social network channels (Twitter, Facebook etc.).
After all the negative feedback on the new logo, they quickly posted this message on their Facebook page: “Thanks for everyone’s input on the new logo! We’ve had the same logo for 20+ years, and this is just one of the things we’re changing. We know this logo created a lot of buzz and we’re thrilled to see passionate debates unfolding! So much so we’re asking you to share your designs. We love our version, but we’d like to… see other ideas. Stay tuned for details in the next few days on this crowd sourcing project.”
The new logo is really bad.If my thinking on this is correct, it’s a risking move on Gap’s part. Create an online revolt, position their customers as heroes and stick with the original logo when they had no intention of ever changing it.

Either way, we’re talking about a brand that has been struggling to stay relevant. They need to take risks and it will be interesting to see if those risks pay off.

I’m starting to think the new Gap logo was done horribly on purpose, in an effort to create a social media firestorm. The evidence…

  • There was no press release issued from the Gap regarding the branding change.
  • The new logo is just barely believable.
  • The favicon logo on Gap’s website wasn’t changed (geek detail).
  • The new logo wasn’t added to any of Gap’s social network channels (Twitter, Facebook etc.).
  • After all the negative feedback on the new logo, they quickly posted this message on their Facebook page: “Thanks for everyone’s input on the new logo! We’ve had the same logo for 20+ years, and this is just one of the things we’re changing. We know this logo created a lot of buzz and we’re thrilled to see passionate debates unfolding! So much so we’re asking you to share your designs. We love our version, but we’d like to… see other ideas. Stay tuned for details in the next few days on this crowd sourcing project.”
  • The new logo is really bad.

If my thinking on this is correct, it’s a risking move on Gap’s part. Create an online revolt, position their customers as heroes and stick with the original logo when they had no intention of ever changing it.

Either way, we’re talking about a brand that has been struggling to stay relevant. They need to take risks and it will be interesting to see if those risks pay off.

(Source: soupsoup)

Reblogged from soupsoup 1 year ago65 ♥

  1. pullthefuggingtrigger reblogged this from edatrix
  2. dobredobre reblogged this from adharmabum and added:
    thank goodness. too bad about their still-terrible website design. seriously, JUST DROP THE HELVETICA.
  3. adharmabum reblogged this from dobredobre and added:
    They got rid of it, yes! http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/39622202/from/toolbar?GT1=43001
  4. charlottefemke reblogged this from soupsoup
  5. gbr4k reblogged this from soupsoup
  6. in-aglasshouse reblogged this from mayormccheese and added:
    Wow. That’s awful.
  7. mayormccheese reblogged this from dobredobre and added:
    Lol, Helvetica Neue.
  8. wildorchidz said: one word: ewww
  9. bekkarae said: Totally a fail. Who got paid to come up with that?
  10. letsgetwilde reblogged this from soupsoup
  11. whenitrainsitpours reblogged this from edatrix and added:
    So dumb. They said themselves that they’d had the same logo for over 20 years. Why would you change something you’ve had...
  12. ttfe reblogged this from soupsoup
  13. jeremywatt reblogged this from soupsoup and added:
    I’m starting to think the new Gap logo was done horribly on purpose, in an effort to create a social media firestorm....
  14. and-the-worldspinsmadlyon reblogged this from edatrix and added:
    wow, it’s terrible.
  15. daigski reblogged this from anithought and added:
    “it makes Old Navy, Gap’s low-end retail sister, look like a luxury brand by comparison.”
  16. aimers reblogged this from soupsoup
  17. somaroy reblogged this from soupsoup and added:
    I mean. Look at that. Is that not the worst logo ever (for a clothing brand)? They could have just taken the blue...
  18. anithought reblogged this from soupsoup
  19. wesruvlikesstuff reblogged this from soupsoup and added:
    DUDE!!!11 THEY R THINKIN OUTSIDE THE [ ] Did Massimo Vignelli do this? No… wait… their collateral sucks and there’s a...
  20. livinglights reblogged this from soupsoup and added:
    My opinion on this can be easily summed up in one word - boring. I hope they didn’t waste too much money on that...
  21. thebattleofwits reblogged this from soupsoup and added:
    I feel like this has to be some sort of elaborate social media prank. It has to, right? Because I’m utterly confused by...
  22. retrophiliac reblogged this from soupsoup and added:
    BAHAHAHAHAHA REMINDS ME OF PEPSI’S LOGO FAIL
  23. acronyms reblogged this from soupsoup
  24. mccyp said: This is terrible in so many ways.The longer I look at it the more I think it’s not a whole word…Maybe future logo design experts will use this: Gapture (ruining a perfect logo), gaptic: the awkward feel you get when looking at Gapture.
  25. ianwithab reblogged this from soupsoup
  26. mismatchghost reblogged this from soupsoup
  27. sui-generic reblogged this from soupsoup and added:
    So…why does everyone seem to hate the new GAP logo? I’m pretty fond of it. Yes, I am that person.
  28. vneckandacardigan said: sigh… leave well enough alone.